Rhiza Labs FluTracker Forum

I have a couple of thoughts, but I am just making stuff up.
Thought one: The readership is up here because this thread was posted at http://www.rense.com.
Thought two: It is a fact that people can have a dormant MRSA colony inside thier sinuses, especially seniors and nurses. MRSA in sinuses lays dormant, according to current information available to us. But MRSA in the lungs produces blood in the lungs and a fast death. Don't A LOT of people have MRSA colony's inside thier sinus cavity from hospital stays and nursing home stays, then the family and care givers contract it?
I read this entire thread and I saw an article herein that stated that there was a staph complication in these deaths according to autopsy. The article did not say what strain of staph was the culprit. What if the people that die of the flu complications, already have always had a MRSA colony's inside thier sinus cavity and the people that do not die, have never contracted the "dormant" MRSA colony in said nose/sinus?
Again, MRSA infecting the lungs is a fatal infection, and why wouldn't the H3 flu cause the MRSA to migrate, become active and infect the lungs along side the flu? The CDC would NEVER go public with this (if possible) complication-for obvious reasons.
FMW

I have a couple of thoughts, but I am just making stuff up.
Thought one: The readership is up here because this thread was posted at http://www.rense.com.
Thought two: It is a fact that people can have a dormant MRSA colony inside thier sinuses, especially seniors and nurses. MRSA in sinuses lays dormant, according to current information available to us. But MRSA in the lungs produces blood in the lungs and a fast death. Don't A LOT of people have MRSA colony's inside thier sinus cavity from hospital stays and nursing home stays, then the family and care givers contract it?
I read this entire thread and I saw an article herein that stated that there was a staph complication in these deaths according to autopsy. The article did not say what strain of staph was the culprit. What if the people that die of the flu complications, already have always had a MRSA colony's inside thier sinus cavity and the people that do not die, have never contracted the "dormant" MRSA colony in said nose/sinus?
Again, MRSA infecting the lungs is a fatal infection, and why wouldn't the H3 flu cause the MRSA to migrate, become active and infect the lungs along side the flu? The CDC would NEVER go public with this (if possible) complication-for obvious reasons.
FMW

I have a couple of thoughts, but I am just making stuff up.
Thought one: The readership is up here because this thread was posted at http://www.rense.com.
Thought two: It is a fact that people can have a dormant MRSA colony inside thier sinuses, especially seniors and nurses. MRSA in sinuses lays dormant, according to current information available to us. But MRSA in the lungs produces blood in the lungs and a fast death. Don't A LOT of people have MRSA colony's inside thier sinus cavity from hospital stays and nursing home stays, then the family and care givers contract it?
I read this entire thread and I saw an article herein that stated that there was a staph complication in these deaths according to autopsy. The article did not say what strain of staph was the culprit. What if the people that die of the flu complications, already have always had a MRSA colony's inside thier sinus cavity and the people that do not die, have never contracted the "dormant" MRSA colony in said nose/sinus?
Again, MRSA infecting the lungs is a fatal infection, and why wouldn't the H3 flu cause the MRSA to migrate, become active and infect the lungs along side the flu? The CDC would NEVER go public with this (if possible) complication-for obvious reasons.
FMW

Hope you don't mind my popping in here, but this statement caught my attention. Does this mean that it was NOT just Ruth's CHILDREN who took care of her, but other family members were also helping? The grand-daugher seems to be indicating that. Or is this just a general statement about Ruth's adult children? -k

Thanks to Treyfish

LenaSun wrote:
12:32 PM EST

"This is Lena Sun, the reporter who's been writing about the health aspects of this story. To answer many of your questions--which are good!--Ruth Blake DID have a seasonal flu vaccine, according to David Rogers, the Calvert County health officer. None of the others were vaccinated, he said. This year the flu season has gotten off to a late start. All the health officials I've talked to are urging folks to get a flu shot if they haven't done so already".

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/ ... l#comments

Thanks niman and little bird, and just so you know I do not have any medical training.
That said, RE: She says the bacterial infection they had was a staphylococcal (staph) infection, which she calls a super infection. Cultures on the surviving sister are not back yet. The source of the staph is still unknown, but Orlowski says the bacteria is naturally on the body. On skin, in the nose
I reckon they can not say MRSA as that WOULD cause a panic.
Also, they are down playing it bacause MRSA is easy to transmit person to person and that would mean that MRSA is a ticking "flu time bomb" in everyone-that would be pretty big news considering it is an infection that is in malls, movies, and gyms-which one can contract and never even know it.
Enter H3 and boom-you MAY have a three in four chance of death......In my opinion, and I ain't nobody, but they will never ever disclose to us that is was MRSa, which I think it was MRSA. These are just my thoughts in my "suspicious of media and untrusting nature regarding the news" brain.