Rhiza Labs FluTracker Forum

The place to discuss the flu
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 1:28 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 11:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:44 am
Posts: 887
niman wrote:
I commented on the Australian thread

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=54&start=200


Thanks. Having a dud out of date vax isn't going to help either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:33 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27403
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Dingo wrote:
niman wrote:
I commented on the Australian thread

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=54&start=200


Thanks. Having a dud out of date vax isn't going to help either.

Correct. The vaccine is a cruel hoax this season.

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 11:05 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27403
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
niman wrote:
The recently released raipd communication, "Increased detection in Australia and Singapore of a novel influenza A(H1N1)2009 variant with reduced oseltamivir and zanamivir sensitivity due to a S247N neuraminidase mutation" descibes the spread of S246N in Singapore and Australia via clonal expansion. However, the associated phylogenetic tree demonstrates spread of S246N via recombination as well, leading to this chnage being appended onto multiple branches, incluidng those with S188T.

However, the clonally expanding branch has the HA change, E359A (labeled E373A in the figure) which is a relatively new acquisition (all isolates in the figure are from 2011 or late 2010). Recently released 2011 sequences from Italy have E359A (but NA sequences have not been released), raising concerns that NA S246N is spreading in Europe also.

http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArt ... leId=19884

In Perth, Western Australia, an immunocompromised patient was found on 1 March 2011 to be infected with an influenza virus that contained the S247N NA mutation (A/Perth/30/2011) (Table). Oseltamivir treatment was commenced two days after detecting the initial S247N variant (3 March). A sputum specimen collected five days later (8 March) contained an influenza virus with both the S247N and H275Y NA mutations (A/Perth/29/2011) (Table). Despite commencement of intravenous zanamivir the patient died on 16 March from multiple organ failure. The isolate with the dual S247N and H275Y mutations had an oseltamivir IC50 nearly 6,000-fold higher than sensitive viruses and 10-fold higher than seen for influenza A(H1N1)2009 viruses with the H275Y mutation alone (Table).

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 11:08 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27403
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
niman wrote:
niman wrote:
The recently released raipd communication, "Increased detection in Australia and Singapore of a novel influenza A(H1N1)2009 variant with reduced oseltamivir and zanamivir sensitivity due to a S247N neuraminidase mutation" descibes the spread of S246N in Singapore and Australia via clonal expansion. However, the associated phylogenetic tree demonstrates spread of S246N via recombination as well, leading to this chnage being appended onto multiple branches, incluidng those with S188T.

However, the clonally expanding branch has the HA change, E359A (labeled E373A in the figure) which is a relatively new acquisition (all isolates in the figure are from 2011 or late 2010). Recently released 2011 sequences from Italy have E359A (but NA sequences have not been released), raising concerns that NA S246N is spreading in Europe also.

http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArt ... leId=19884

In Perth, Western Australia, an immunocompromised patient was found on 1 March 2011 to be infected with an influenza virus that contained the S247N NA mutation (A/Perth/30/2011) (Table). Oseltamivir treatment was commenced two days after detecting the initial S247N variant (3 March). A sputum specimen collected five days later (8 March) contained an influenza virus with both the S247N and H275Y NA mutations (A/Perth/29/2011) (Table). Despite commencement of intravenous zanamivir the patient died on 16 March from multiple organ failure. The isolate with the dual S247N and H275Y mutations had an oseltamivir IC50 nearly 6,000-fold higher than sensitive viruses and 10-fold higher than seen for influenza A(H1N1)2009 viruses with the H275Y mutation alone (Table).

The appearance of H274Y five days after the start of Tamiflu treatment indocates H274Y was initailly present as a mixture (but not indicated in the initial published sequence). The sample collected after the start of Tamiflu has H274Y, with no indication of a mixture, and the HA sequence for both collections is identical.

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:10 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27403
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Remember WHO labs have "agreed" to NOT report H274Y in samples where levels are below 50%. Thus, this case begins as "wild type" for position 274 and quickly converts to H274Y followed by the patient's death.

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:12 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27403
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
niman wrote:
Remember WHO labs have "agreed" to NOT report H274Y in samples where levels are below 50%. Thus, this case begins as "wild type" for position 274 and quickly converts to H274Y followed by the patient's death.

WHO H274Y scam

http://www.recombinomics.com/News/03301 ... _Scam.html

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 2:37 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27403
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Commentary

http://www.recombinomics.com/News/06121 ... H274Y.html

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:45 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27403
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
niman wrote:

The rapid spread of S246N in Australia will cause SERIOUS problems.

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:46 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27403
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
INFLUENZA (41): NEURAMINIDASE MUTATION
**************************************
A ProMED-mail post
<http://www.promedmail.org>
ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases
<http://www.isid.org>

Date: Fri 9 Jun 2011
Source: Eurosurveillance, Volume 16, Issue 23 [abridged; edited]
<http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19884>


Increased detection in Australia and Singapore of a novel influenza
A(H1N1)2009 variant with reduced oseltamivir and zanamivir sensitivity
due to a S247N neuraminidase mutation
----------------------------------------------------------------
By: Hurt AC, Lee RT, Leang SK, Cui L, Deng YM, Phuah SP, Caldwell N,
Freeman K, Komadina N, Smith D, Speers D, Kelso A, Lin RT, Maurer-
Stroh S, Barr IG. Euro Surveill. 2011;16(23):pii=19884. Available
online:
<http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19884>

Summary
-------
A novel influenza A(H1N1)2009 variant with mildly reduced oseltamivir
and zanamivir sensitivity has been detected in more than 10 percent of
community specimens in Singapore and more than 30 percent of samples
from northern Australia during the early months of 2011. The variant,
which has also been detected in other regions of the Asia-Pacific,
contains a S247N neuraminidase mutation. When combined with the H275Y
mutation, as detected in an oseltamivir-treated patient, the dual
S247N+H275Y mutant had extremely high oseltamivir resistance.

Introduction
------------
The emergence and global spread in 2007/08 of an
oseltamivir-resistant seasonal influenza A(H1N1) variant containing a
histidine to tyrosine substitution (H275Y) in the neuraminidase (NA),
demonstrated the potential for drug-resistant influenza viruses to
arise and spread within the community in the absence of drug-selective
pressure [1]. Since the start of the 2009 pandemic, the
oseltamivir-resistant H275Y variant has only been detected on rare
occasions in pandemic influenza A(H1N1)2009 community specimens (<1
percent), although recent reports have suggested that this frequency
may be increasing [2]. Other NA mutations in influenza A(H1N1)2009
viruses have been reported to confer mildly reduced oseltamivir and/or
zanamivir sensitivity, such as substitutions at the isoleucine residue
at position 223 (N1 numbering), but the detection of these mutants has
been very rare and has occurred mostly in isolated cases of
immunocompromised individuals under long-term NA inhibitor (NAI)
treatment [3,4].

Here we report the identification and increased rate of detection in
community samples of a novel influenza A(H1N1)2009 variant with
reduced oseltamivir and zanamivir sensitivity. The variant contained a
serine to asparagine mutation at residue 247 (S247N) of the NA, and
has been detected in recent community specimens from Australia, Brunei
and Singapore. Although the mutation has been described before in a
small number of seasonal influenza A(H1N1) and highly pathogenic
influenza A(H5N1) viruses with reduced NAI sensitivity [5,6], it has
not previously been reported in influenza A(H1N1)2009 viruses, and has
not occurred in any strains at the frequencies that are described
here.

[Readers are referred to the original text at the source URL for a
detailed account of the methods, experimental data and the literatures
cited]

Discussion
----------
Previous studies have reported the effect of the S247N mutation on
NAI sensitivity in N1 neuraminidases. The levels of oseltamivir and
zanamivir sensitivity reported for the S247N mutation in a
pre-pandemic seasonal influenza A(H1N1) virus were similar to those
reported here for the mutation in influenza A(H1N1)2009 strains [5].
However a greater reduction in oseltamivir sensitivity was reported
for a highly pathogenic influenza A(H5N1) strain with a S247N mutation
compared to the influenza A(H1N1)2009 strains reported here (24-fold
vs 6-fold reduction compared to their respective wildtypes) [6]. The
same study also reported on an influenza A(H5N1) virus with the S247N
and 2 additional mutations, I223L and K150N (N1 numbering). This
triple mutant virus had a greater reduction in oseltamivir sensitivity
compared to the S247N mutation alone (77-fold vs 24-fold reduction),
further demonstrating that mutations at other key residues such as
I223, in combination with S247N, can cumulatively decrease NAI
sensitivity. Given that a number of studies have recently reported
I223 mutations conferring NAI resistance in influenza A(H1N1)2009
strains [3,4,9,10], and that data from the United Kingdom show an
increased frequency of H275Y mutants in community samples [2], the
likelihood of mutation combinations S247N+I223X and S247N+H275Y is
considerably increased if the S247N influenza A(H1N1)2009 variant
continues to spread.

Pharmacokinetic data would suggest that the maximum drug levels
achieved via the recommended dose easily exceed the observed IC50
values of the S247N mutant [11], and therefore the variant is unlikely
to be clinically resistant. However, it is noteworthy that recent
clinical studies have demonstrated a reduced oseltamivir efficacy for
normal influenza B viruses [12] which have IC50 values only 6-fold
higher than that of the S247N influenza A(H1N1)2009 variants (mean
oseltamivir IC50 plus-or-minus SD for influenza B viruses from 2010
and 2011: 15.5 nM plus-or-minus11.3 (n=557)). Data from Singapore and
Darwin demonstrate that the S247N variant is able to circulate widely
and therefore does not appear to have compromised viral fitness or
transmissibility. If the S247N variant spreads globally, the greatest
concern is that other NA mutations which may have previously caused
only mild reductions in NAI susceptibility (e.g., mutations at the
I223 residue) could instead cumulatively decrease NAI sensitivity to
levels that may be clinically significant and affect treatment
efficacy. Laboratories should consider screening currently circulating
specimens and isolates for the S247N NA mutation to determine whether
the variant is spreading into other regions.

--
Communicated by:
HealthMap alerts via ProMED-mail
<promed@promedmail.org>

[The authors point out that although the maximum drug levels achieved
via the currently recommended doses employed clinically exceed the
observed IC50 values for the S247N mutant, it is likely that
cumulative mutations in the neuraminidase gene may enhance resistance
progressively and continued surveillance is desirable. - Mod.CP]

[see also:
2009
----
Influenza pandemic (H1N1) 2009 (31): drug resistance 20090815.2900
2007
----
Avian influenza, human (15): Egypt, drug resistance 20070119.0253
Avian influenza, human (15): Egypt, drug resistance 20070118.0238
2005
----
Influenza viruses, drug resistance (06) 20051016.3021
Influenza viruses, drug resistance (05) 20051015.3014
Influenza viruses, drug resistance (04) 20051015.2999
Influenza viruses, drug resistance (03) 20051007.2924
Influenza viruses, drug resistance (02): RFI 20051001.2878
Influenza viruses, drug resistance 20050930.2863
2004
----
Avian influenza A (H5N1) virus, drug resistance (02) 20040127.0316
Avian influenza A (H5N1) virus, drug resistance 20040125.0298]
.................................................sb/cp/ejp/dk

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:44 am
Posts: 887
niman wrote:
Dingo wrote:
niman wrote:
I commented on the Australian thread

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=54&start=200


Thanks. Having a dud out of date vax isn't going to help either.

Correct. The vaccine is a cruel hoax this season.


Just read your latest commentary.

The vax is a hoax and it looks like our big stockpile of Tamiflu will be useless. Pharmacists here tell me stocks of Relenza are low and hard to get.

This doesn't look good. Is this new mutation mix more severe/fatal? Or just more resistant?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: emrj, niman and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group