Rhiza Labs FluTracker Forum

The place to discuss the flu
It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 12:09 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:00 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27547
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
gsgs wrote:
Gs and I had a chat recently about his concern that pandemic H1N1 (***flu) will reassort with swine flu and become the next pandemic.

We thought we should share the chat and encourage anyone with questions, comments, opinions, etc. to share them.

gsgs [10:23]: talk about H1 ?
mixin [10:23]: sure
gsgs [10:23]: much reassortment in swine
gsgs [10:23]: including ***flu
mixin[10:23]: we should be worried?
gsgs [10:23]: ***flu reasorts with swineflu
gsgs [10:24]: well, swineflu did reassort before
gsgs [10:24]: but now we have the Eurasian segments included
gsgs [10:24]: and it's easily transported over continents
gsgs [10:24]: by humans
gsgs [10:25]: no longer Eurasian and American swine viruses
gsgs [10:25]: quarantine of swine no longer works
gsgs [10:25]: because they get human (***flu) viruses and then reassort
gsgs [10:26]: we are immune meanwhile to swine-H1
mixin[10:26]: what segments are reassorted?
gsgs [10:26]: via ***flu
gsgs [10:26]: but NOT to
gsgs [10:26]: European swine H1
gsgs [10:27]: which went from birds to swine in 1978 in Europe
gsgs [10:27]: and then frequently occurred in Europe and Asia, but not America
gsgs [10:27]: quarantine worked
gsgs [10:27]: now we have already 2 of these European segments in ***flu
gsgs [10:28]: (segments 6 and 7)
gsgs [10:28]: and it exists since 1978 in Eurasia, but didn't jump to humans
gsgs [10:28]: so , why now ?
gsgs [10:28]: becaue it reassorts with the other swine strains
gsgs [10:29]: which are already in humans
gsgs [10:29]: and swine
gsgs [10:29]: this may enhance European swine H1 's capability to reassort and jump to humans
gsgs [10:30]: then we get European H1 (Avian(1978))
gsgs [10:30]: to which we have no immunity
gsgs [10:31]: I think, it was already in humans occasionally
gsgs [10:31]: European,Asian swine workers, swine farmers
gsgs [10:31]: and AFAIK it is not so virulent
gsgs [10:31]: but still
gsgs [10:32]: I do see pandemic danger from Eurasian swine H1
mixin[10:32]: do you think mexico has a reassorted strain?
gsgs [10:32]: yes
gsgs [10:32]: this was established in May 2009
gsgs [10:32]: remember ?
gsgs [10:33]: 123458 from triple-reassortant American swine
mixin[10:33]: I mean whatever is going around now... is it a different strain?
gsgs [10:33]: and 67 from Eurasian swine
gsgs [10:33]: not in humans
gsgs [10:33]: not the public sequences
gsgs [10:33]: maybe in Chihuahua
gsgs [10:34]: i make it 20%
gsgs [10:34]: but it may happen again, later, in Asia
mixin[10:34]: Isn't our vax still good as long as HA stays basically the same?
gsgs [10:34]: yes
gsgs [10:35]: but not against Eurasian HA
gsgs [10:35]: our vax and more important : our immunity
mixin [10:35]: but as long as HA doesn't reassort, we are OK?
gsgs [10:35]: almost
gsgs [10:36]: reassortment is usually enhanced virus evolution
gsgs [10:36]: getting more "features" more quickly
gsgs [10:37]: transmission,survival,entering other sorts of cells,virulence
gsgs [10:37]: it's not just immunity and HA
gsgs [10:37]: NA,MP also play some role in immunty, though smaller than HA
gsgs [10:38]: but as for a new pandemic, we should concentrate on HA
mixin[10:38]: About your 20%.. there's a 20% chance that a new pandemic will start soon?
gsgs [10:39]: no, 20% that chihuahuaflu has reassorted
gsgs [10:39]: with non***flu-segments
mixin [10:39]: it is a bit strange that they haven't released many sequences
gsgs [10:39]: probably not in HA
gsgs [10:40]: well, they already did test HA and NA
gsgs [10:40]: uploaded to genbank
gsgs [10:40]: I don't know whether they did test other segments
mixin [10:40]: No H1 sequences at Gisaid for a week
mixin [10:41]: unless there is some since yesterday
gsgs [10:41]: so, what about European swinish H1-HA ?
mixin [10:41]: I didn't look
gsgs [10:41]: that seems to be the biggest danger now
gsgs [10:41]: what do you think about the danger
gsgs [10:41]: my explanation
gsgs [10:42]: should we post about it
gsgs [10:42]: reformulate
gsgs [10:42]: with links
mixin [10:42]: I'm not sure what to think; but I always trust your opinion
gsgs [10:42]: did you see it elsewhere
mixin [10:42]: no
gsgs [10:42]: ask other experts whether they agree
gsgs [10:43]: it should be discussed now
gsgs [10:43]: IMO
mixin [10:45]: so what now has you more worried than before?
gsgs [10:46]: frequent reassortment in swine
gsgs [10:46]: involving ***flu

Nonsense.

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:11 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27547
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
niman wrote:
gsgs wrote:
Gs and I had a chat recently about his concern that pandemic H1N1 (***flu) will reassort with swine flu and become the next pandemic.

We thought we should share the chat and encourage anyone with questions, comments, opinions, etc. to share them.

mixin[10:38]: About your 20%.. there's a 20% chance that a new pandemic will start soon?
gsgs [10:39]: no, 20% that chihuahuaflu has reassorted
gsgs [10:39]: with non***flu-segments
mixin [10:39]: it is a bit strange that they haven't released many sequences
gsgs [10:39]: probably not in HA
gsgs [10:40]: well, they already did test HA and NA
gsgs [10:40]: uploaded to genbank
gsgs [10:40]: I don't know whether they did test other segments
mixin [10:40]: No H1 sequences at Gisaid for a week

Nonsense.

Reality check. The CDC released H1N1 sequences on Wednesday, as posted here
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=7084

Please stop putting up blatantly false statements.

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:24 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:54 pm
Posts: 1783
Location: germany
20% is too much or too little in your opinion ?

gisaid is not "published"

_________________
no patents on genes, publish the GISAID sequences !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:32 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27547
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
gsgs wrote:
20% is too much or too little in your opinion ?

gisaid is not "published"

Go away. Your wacko comments are beyond annoying. You just posted that new H1N1 sequences were NOT at GISAID, when they were . Now you are saying the sequences at GISAID are not public when they show that your 20% estimate on reassortant in Chihuahua is not based on reality.

You are posting BLATANT lies.

Go away.

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:30 pm
Posts: 111
niman wrote:
gsgs wrote:
20% is too much or too little in your opinion ?

gisaid is not "published"

Go away. Your wacko comments are beyond annoying. You just posted that new H1N1 sequences were NOT at GISAID, when they were . Now you are saying the sequences at GISAID are not public when they show that your 20% estimate on reassortant in Chihuahua is not based on reality.

You are posting BLATANT lies.

Go away.


You are the one who needs a reality check, Niman.

I was the one who posted that there had been no new sequences for the past week. At the time, the 108 GISAID sequences had not been submitted.

If you are going to comment on his post, at least read it first.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:37 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27547
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Mixin wrote:
niman wrote:
gsgs wrote:
20% is too much or too little in your opinion ?

gisaid is not "published"

Go away. Your wacko comments are beyond annoying. You just posted that new H1N1 sequences were NOT at GISAID, when they were . Now you are saying the sequences at GISAID are not public when they show that your 20% estimate on reassortant in Chihuahua is not based on reality.

You are posting BLATANT lies.

Go away.


You are the one who needs a reality check, Niman.

I was the one who posted that there had been no new sequences for the past week. At the time, the 108 GISAID sequences had not been submitted.

GSGS posted your nonsense chat TODAY (with no date).

Your chat is OBSOLETE and posted TODAY implying it had current info.

As I said, it is NOT reality based (and GSGS continues to say that the public sequences are not public, which is FALSE).

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:30 pm
Posts: 111
Again, Reading 101

Quote:
Gs and I had a chat recently about his concern


And the chat wasn't about GISAID (although that's what you made it about). It was about his concern about reassortment in swine.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:56 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27547
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Mixin wrote:
Again, Reading 101

Quote:
Gs and I had a chat recently about his concern


And the chat wasn't about GISAID (although that's what you made it about). It was about his concern about reassortment in swine.

Recently is NOT a date, and the posted data was FALSE when posted.

It is silly because the data released Wednesday destroyed the entire chat session, which gave a 20% prediction that Chihuahua was due to reassortment with human flu segments.

The PUBLISHED data shows that MD/04 was collected on 02/02/2011 while PA/02 was collected on 02/22/2011. FULL sequences for both isolates, which are VERY closely related to Chihuahua, have NO reassortment.

Chihuahua sequences have D225G and D225N, which is the cause of the problem, not GSGS's wishful thinking on reassortment, which has NO support for Chihuahua, 20% estimate notwithstanding.

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:53 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27547
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
gsgs wrote:
20% is too much or too little in your opinion ?

gisaid is not "published"

The liklihood of reassortment in the Chihuahua outbreak is VERY close to ZERO. The outbreak problem is linked to D225G, D225N, and D225A and is driven by HA changes, no reassortment required.

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 6:29 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27547
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Mixin wrote:
Again, Reading 101

Quote:
Gs and I had a chat recently about his concern


And the chat wasn't about GISAID (although that's what you made it about). It was about his concern about reassortment in swine.

The chat gave a 20% chance that there was reassortment in Chihuahua, which was THOROUGHLY discounted by the sequences released Wednesday at GISAID (which were predicted by uunpublished data with D225N, which had NO reassortment. The argument is about GISAID because that is where the PUBLIC DATA is, no speculation or bogus odds required.

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gsgs, Majestic-12 [Bot], niman and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group