Rhiza Labs FluTracker Forum

The place to discuss the flu
It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 1:16 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please only post reports here for these countries: Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Vatican City



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1292 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108 ... 130  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: UK
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 7:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:22 pm
Posts: 5180
Location: East of London
Dingo wrote:
stephensons wrote:


There are lots of unhappy-bunnies here about having p-H1N1 2009's vaccination. They feel like second-class citizens. Don't they know we already are???


Isn't the H1N1 component the same for both? It was down here.


Yes the H1N1 component is the same. The p-H1N1 2009 jab (which has been in storage) is still only going to be offered to those in the 'at risk groups' (due to shortages of the trivalent vaccine). The main 'gripe' seems to be with the people in the 'non at-risk' group who want either the p-H1N1/or trivalent vaccine but can't get hold of it for love nor money. It's completely ballsed up.

_________________
Praemonitus, Praemunitus..Forewarned is Forearmed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: UK
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 8:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:14 pm
Posts: 548
Fears over mutating flu virus that could render vaccine useless

By DAILY MAIL REPORTER

Last updated at 11:56 PM on 8th January 2011


A research team has hurriedly been re-formed to investigate whether the swine flu virus has started to mutate in a way that will render the vaccine ineffective.

Senior Government scientists have already discovered slight genetic mutations in the H1N1 virus.

They are checking whether this is causing some people to be more severely affected, although there is no evidence at this stage to suggest the changes would stop the vaccine working or prevent the anti-viral drug Tamiflu from being effective.



So far, 45 people are known to have died from swine flu since October.

The team, based at Imperial College London, are testing the DNA samples of hundreds of swine flu victims.
Professor Peter Openshaw, director of the Centre for Respiratory Infection at Imperial, said: ‘We have paid particular attention to whether the mutations are affecting how well the vaccine works and whether the slight mutations have led to it becoming more severe.’
The study, known as MOSAIC, was set up in 2009 to monitor the virus during the pandemic, but it was swiftly re-assembled last month with the latest outbreak.

Unprotected: A are checking whether this is causing some people to be more severely affected

Asthma specialist nurse Katy Odeadra, who works in the Chest and Allergy Clinic at St Mary’s Hospital, said: ‘All the talk among doctors and nurses dealing with swine flu cases is of a mutated form of the virus.’

The Health Protection Agency said yesterday: ‘The vaccine still works.’


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1AUZ23KZ3


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: UK
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 8:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 8:43 pm
Posts: 469
Frankly, Stephenson, I would be very surprised if the current vaccine works at all anymore. I'm not directing this post at you specifically (although it may feel like it). I'm directing it towards everyone who is afraid and thinks the flu jab might help.

There simply aren't enough numbers to prove it one way or the other, and officialdom seems hell-bent to skew the speech towards the vaccine. Yes, maybe it would increase panic if everyone was told that the current vaccine didn't work. Certainly, all the vaccine in storage would need to be disposed of at great cost to governments who purchased it. Certainly, governments and health authorities would worry that such a disclosure would damage their efforts to vaccinate again the following year. And certainly, governments would lose vast sums of money in disposing of unused vaccines held in storage. But lives could be also be saved by focusing on things that might actually improve your chances of not getting sick. Perhaps keeping students away from school would be helpful. Perhaps a period of isolation might be beneficial to societal health. Perhaps public trust would actually increase if they knew they were getting the full load of information they needed to substantiate officialdom claims. Just because a health authority claims something doesn't mean it actually is. Unless they can produce hard facts substantiating the claims, it would be foolish to blindly believe. The sad matter is, even those in higher perches probably aren't being given sufficient information to make qualified decisions. Had they, the UK probably wouldn't be where it is now. Why didn't the UK have sufficient vaccines? Is it possible the officials knew beforehand that the vaccine this year would be less capable (or even incapable) of offering protection, and so they didn't want to spend more money on rebuilding their stockpiles? I don't know the answer to this. I wish I did though.

But the fact that in a large fraction of the reports I'm reading I see no numbers to help delineate between the vaccinated and non-vaccinated is an indication of manipulation by the authorities. Look to the real world for your evidence. Find out for yourself from those you know who are ill whether they were vaccinated or not. Then draw your own conclusions.

I have always been uncertain whether the vaccine works. In hindsight, I believe it probably did help last year, but then they tackled the problem quickly and obtained a vaccine soon after the virus became a problem - probably before it had time to change. Now, however, and particularly as time passes, I have more and more doubt that anything will really work, except perhaps those drugs that inhibit viral growth.

Consider this as well... Dr. Niman (and others I have read about) have stated that most of the world population has probably already been exposed to H1N1, whether you became sick or not. At least some level of exposure is likely to have taken place. Perhaps the stronger the exposure, the greater your body's response is and the greater the protection you receive. My son had H1N1 multiple times last go-round - and neither time was pretty. I never fell ill at all (had a bit of a cough at one time, but nothing close to what others had). Am I therefore protected? Is my son protected? Why should we get a flu shot for H1N1 if they're injecting us with the same serum that was used to combat it the first time?

I'll bet there is hardly anyone here who does not know of someone personally who became sick during the last season of H1N1 (or suspected H1N1). That means they were exposed, and you probably were too if you didn't get sick yourself. Why then, are so many people getting sick with it in the UK again? You can't tell me those who are sick never had any antibodies (or whatever they're called) created during the first wave. I can't accept that. No way. The numbers are too significant. So why isn't the vaccine or prior exposure working? And if it isn't working, what is the point in getting the jab if they've filled the syringe with the contents of a vaccine that protects against an outdated virus? I suppose if false-hope is what people are looking for, then they should get the jab.

I'm still of the opinion that we don't have sufficient numbers to say, one way or the other, whether this years vaccine works. I have only seen one report from Dr. Niman that suggested that most of the people who were included in the study (who were either dead or very sick) had not previously been vaccinated. And the sampling was tiny. That's not good enough to make believable.

Take care of your own. Wash frequently. Avoid large crowds if you worry about this bug. Keep your kids home from school if you're that concerned. But getting the flu jab is, in my mind, like driving a car with only one lug-nut fastened to a tire. You can buy accident insurance if you'd like, but it won't decrease your odds of having an accident.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: UK
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 8:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:22 pm
Posts: 5180
Location: East of London
Pandora wrote:
Frankly, Stephenson, I would be very surprised if the current vaccine works at all anymore. I'm not directing this post at you specifically (although it may feel like it). I'm directing it towards everyone who is afraid and thinks the flu jab might help.

There simply aren't enough numbers to prove it one way or the other, and officialdom seems hell-bent to skew the speech towards the vaccine. Yes, maybe it would increase panic if everyone was told that the current vaccine didn't work. Certainly, all the vaccine in storage would need to be disposed of at great cost to governments who purchased it. Certainly, governments and health authorities would worry that such a disclosure would damage their efforts to vaccinate again the following year. And certainly, governments would lose vast sums of money in disposing of unused vaccines held in storage. But lives could be also be saved by focusing on things that might actually improve your chances of not getting sick. Perhaps keeping students away from school would be helpful. Perhaps a period of isolation might be beneficial to societal health. Perhaps public trust would actually increase if they knew they were getting the full load of information they needed to substantiate officialdom claims. Just because a health authority claims something doesn't mean it actually is. Unless they can produce hard facts substantiating the claims, it would be foolish to blindly believe. The sad matter is, even those in higher perches probably aren't being given sufficient information to make qualified decisions. Had they, the UK probably wouldn't be where it is now. Why didn't the UK have sufficient vaccines? Is it possible the officials knew beforehand that the vaccine this year would be less capable (or even incapable) of offering protection, and so they didn't want to spend more money on rebuilding their stockpiles? I don't know the answer to this. I wish I did though.

But the fact that in a large fraction of the reports I'm reading I see no numbers to help delineate between the vaccinated and non-vaccinated is an indication of manipulation by the authorities. Look to the real world for your evidence. Find out for yourself from those you know who are ill whether they were vaccinated or not. Then draw your own conclusions.

I have always been uncertain whether the vaccine works. In hindsight, I believe it probably did help last year, but then they tackled the problem quickly and obtained a vaccine soon after the virus became a problem - probably before it had time to change. Now, however, and particularly as time passes, I have more and more doubt that anything will really work, except perhaps those drugs that inhibit viral growth.

Consider this as well... Dr. Niman (and others I have read about) have stated that most of the world population has probably already been exposed to H1N1, whether you became sick or not. At least some level of exposure is likely to have taken place. Perhaps the stronger the exposure, the greater your body's response is and the greater the protection you receive. My son had H1N1 multiple times last go-round - and neither time was pretty. I never fell ill at all (had a bit of a cough at one time, but nothing close to what others had). Am I therefore protected? Is my son protected? Why should we get a flu shot for H1N1 if they're injecting us with the same serum that was used to combat it the first time?

I'll bet there is hardly anyone here who does not know of someone personally who became sick during the last season of H1N1 (or suspected H1N1). That means they were exposed, and you probably were too if you didn't get sick yourself. Why then, are so many people getting sick with it in the UK again? You can't tell me those who are sick never had any antibodies (or whatever they're called) created during the first wave. I can't accept that. No way. The numbers are too significant. So why isn't the vaccine or prior exposure working? And if it isn't working, what is the point in getting the jab if they've filled the syringe with the contents of a vaccine that protects against an outdated virus? I suppose if false-hope is what people are looking for, then they should get the jab.

I'm still of the opinion that we don't have sufficient numbers to say, one way or the other, whether this years vaccine works. I have only seen one report from Dr. Niman that suggested that most of the people who were included in the study (who were either dead or very sick) had not previously been vaccinated. And the sampling was tiny. That's not good enough to make believable.

Take care of your own. Wash frequently. Avoid large crowds if you worry about this bug. Keep your kids home from school if you're that concerned. But getting the flu jab is, in my mind, like driving a car with only one lug-nut fastened to a tire. You can buy accident insurance if you'd like, but it won't decrease your odds of having an accident.


I don't have the answer(s) either Pandora. Like you say, take care of your own and do what you think is in the best interests of you and yours.

_________________
Praemonitus, Praemunitus..Forewarned is Forearmed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: UK
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:30 am
Posts: 687
stephensons wrote:
Pandora wrote:
Frankly, Stephenson, I would be very surprised if the current vaccine works at all anymore. I'm not directing this post at you specifically (although it may feel like it). I'm directing it towards everyone who is afraid and thinks the flu jab might help.

There simply aren't enough numbers to prove it one way or the other, and officialdom seems hell-bent to skew the speech towards the vaccine. Yes, maybe it would increase panic if everyone was told that the current vaccine didn't work. Certainly, all the vaccine in storage would need to be disposed of at great cost to governments who purchased it. Certainly, governments and health authorities would worry that such a disclosure would damage their efforts to vaccinate again the following year. And certainly, governments would lose vast sums of money in disposing of unused vaccines held in storage. But lives could be also be saved by focusing on things that might actually improve your chances of not getting sick. Perhaps keeping students away from school would be helpful. Perhaps a period of isolation might be beneficial to societal health. Perhaps public trust would actually increase if they knew they were getting the full load of information they needed to substantiate officialdom claims. Just because a health authority claims something doesn't mean it actually is. Unless they can produce hard facts substantiating the claims, it would be foolish to blindly believe. The sad matter is, even those in higher perches probably aren't being given sufficient information to make qualified decisions. Had they, the UK probably wouldn't be where it is now. Why didn't the UK have sufficient vaccines? Is it possible the officials knew beforehand that the vaccine this year would be less capable (or even incapable) of offering protection, and so they didn't want to spend more money on rebuilding their stockpiles? I don't know the answer to this. I wish I did though.

But the fact that in a large fraction of the reports I'm reading I see no numbers to help delineate between the vaccinated and non-vaccinated is an indication of manipulation by the authorities. Look to the real world for your evidence. Find out for yourself from those you know who are ill whether they were vaccinated or not. Then draw your own conclusions.

I have always been uncertain whether the vaccine works. In hindsight, I believe it probably did help last year, but then they tackled the problem quickly and obtained a vaccine soon after the virus became a problem - probably before it had time to change. Now, however, and particularly as time passes, I have more and more doubt that anything will really work, except perhaps those drugs that inhibit viral growth.

Consider this as well... Dr. Niman (and others I have read about) have stated that most of the world population has probably already been exposed to H1N1, whether you became sick or not. At least some level of exposure is likely to have taken place. Perhaps the stronger the exposure, the greater your body's response is and the greater the protection you receive. My son had H1N1 multiple times last go-round - and neither time was pretty. I never fell ill at all (had a bit of a cough at one time, but nothing close to what others had). Am I therefore protected? Is my son protected? Why should we get a flu shot for H1N1 if they're injecting us with the same serum that was used to combat it the first time?

I'll bet there is hardly anyone here who does not know of someone personally who became sick during the last season of H1N1 (or suspected H1N1). That means they were exposed, and you probably were too if you didn't get sick yourself. Why then, are so many people getting sick with it in the UK again? You can't tell me those who are sick never had any antibodies (or whatever they're called) created during the first wave. I can't accept that. No way. The numbers are too significant. So why isn't the vaccine or prior exposure working? And if it isn't working, what is the point in getting the jab if they've filled the syringe with the contents of a vaccine that protects against an outdated virus? I suppose if false-hope is what people are looking for, then they should get the jab.

I'm still of the opinion that we don't have sufficient numbers to say, one way or the other, whether this years vaccine works. I have only seen one report from Dr. Niman that suggested that most of the people who were included in the study (who were either dead or very sick) had not previously been vaccinated. And the sampling was tiny. That's not good enough to make believable.

Take care of your own. Wash frequently. Avoid large crowds if you worry about this bug. Keep your kids home from school if you're that concerned. But getting the flu jab is, in my mind, like driving a car with only one lug-nut fastened to a tire. You can buy accident insurance if you'd like, but it won't decrease your odds of having an accident.


I don't have the answer(s) either Pandora. Like you say, take care of your own and do what you think is in the best interests of you and yours.



Antivirals are the best hope to stay less sick. Have some handy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: UK
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:22 pm
Posts: 5180
Location: East of London
CopitoSP wrote:
Fears over mutating flu virus that could render vaccine useless

By DAILY MAIL REPORTER

Last updated at 11:56 PM on 8th January 2011


A research team has hurriedly been re-formed to investigate whether the swine flu virus has started to mutate in a way that will render the vaccine ineffective.

Senior Government scientists have already discovered slight genetic mutations in the H1N1 virus.

They are checking whether this is causing some people to be more severely affected, although there is no evidence at this stage to suggest the changes would stop the vaccine working or prevent the anti-viral drug Tamiflu from being effective.



So far, 45 people are known to have died from swine flu since October.

The team, based at Imperial College London, are testing the DNA samples of hundreds of swine flu victims.
Professor Peter Openshaw, director of the Centre for Respiratory Infection at Imperial, said: ‘We have paid particular attention to whether the mutations are affecting how well the vaccine works and whether the slight mutations have led to it becoming more severe.’
The study, known as MOSAIC, was set up in 2009 to monitor the virus during the pandemic, but it was swiftly re-assembled last month with the latest outbreak.

Unprotected: A are checking whether this is causing some people to be more severely affected

Asthma specialist nurse Katy Odeadra, who works in the Chest and Allergy Clinic at St Mary’s Hospital, said: ‘All the talk among doctors and nurses dealing with swine flu cases is of a mutated form of the virus.’

The Health Protection Agency said yesterday: ‘The vaccine still works.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1AUZ23KZ3


Comments now available, just a few of them;

Working in the NHS, I am a perfectly health person who recently had the vaccination (combined). A week before christmas, during the christmas period and just after, I had a nasty bout of flu followed by a chest infection. Now I am starting to question whether I would have been worse if I had not had the vaccine or whether the vaccine did play a part in my getting flu. I am a now a little concerned with what is being reported today.
- Concerned, Blackpool, 09/1/2011 10:59

Click to rate Rating 39 Report abuse
I am just recently back from hospital after spending a week on life support because of this flu, do not take it lightly!!!! I am fit, live a healthy lifestyle, don't drink or smoke but almost didn't get to see my children grow up! Now I am exhausted, very weak, almost no voice from the tube down my airway and looking at weeks of recovery, seriously if you get this flu and start feeling worse after a few days get help fast!

- Sarah, Lincs, 09/1/2011 10:37
Click to rate Rating 40 Report abuse
Viruses and bacteria mutate that is what all living organisms do!
- Mark, hull, 09/1/2011 10:35
Click to rate Rating 60

_________________
Praemonitus, Praemunitus..Forewarned is Forearmed.


Last edited by stephensons on Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: UK
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:22 pm
Posts: 5180
Location: East of London
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-12142722

Quote:
Supplies of swine flu jab vaccine are being released to GPs in Cardiff and the Vale of Glamorgan from Monday.

Health officials agreed to releasing stocks of the H1N1 flu vaccine to meet demand.

"Because of the prevalence of H1N1 cases we're seeing in the area anyway, the vaccine should do the job for the majority of people," said a health board spokeswoman.
............................................

_________________
Praemonitus, Praemunitus..Forewarned is Forearmed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: UK
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:22 pm
Posts: 5180
Location: East of London
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/healt ... -27953618/

Quote:

Newport MP defends his flu ‘cry wolf’ remarks
Jan 9 2011

by Clare Hutchinson, Wales On Sunday
A LEADING public health expert fears lives could have been put at risk as a result of a Welsh MP “talking down” the dangers of the flu pandemic.

Dr Roland Salmon, director of Public Health Wales’ communicable disease surveillance centre, has called on Newport MP Paul Flynn to apologise for claiming authorities were “crying wolf” over last year’s swine flu outbreak.

But claims such attitudes may have contributed to a reduced vaccine take-up in a season that has already seen 12 flu deaths in Wales have met with a fierce response from the MP, who said he stood by his remarks “100%”.

As well as the 12 deaths directly attributed to flu, Assembly Government figures released this week revealed the virus had also been a contributory factor in a further 45 deaths since October.

Across the UK, 50 people have died from flu over the same period, including 45 who died from swine flu and five with another strain, flu type B. Most deaths are occurring in children and younger people.

In a furious response to Dr Salmon’s comments, Mr Flynn refused to apologise, saying: “I don’t know who he is but if he wants me to apologise I think that is just foolish.”

The left-wing Labour MP, who has tabled two motions in the House of Commons in a bid to expose “the pandemic that never really was”, said in January last year: “We have had four major scares throughout the world of potential mass-killer pandemics but they have been exaggerated.

“Having cried wolf four times, if there is another occasion in the future – if there is a Spanish type of flu – the danger is no-one will take it seriously.

“I believe there is a prima facie case that these scares were exaggerated and the people who have benefited from them are the pharmaceutical industry.”

Since then the MP has drafted two reports for the Council of Europe condemning the decision by the World Health Organisation (WHO) to elevate the status of last year’s swine flu outbreak to a pandemic as an “unjustified scare” and accusing the body of “crying wolf”.

But Dr Salmon has hit out at Mr Flynn, saying his actions were “irresponsible” because they might have persuaded people not to come forward for the vaccine during this winter’s flu season.

He said a slow uptake in people getting the flu vaccine, which protects patients from seasonal and swine flu, might have contributed to recent flu-related deaths.

He said: “We have quite effective vaccinations and treatments against flu but the flu jab uptake figures are still running at slightly less than we managed to get vaccinated last flu season.

“Because of this you start to ask yourself why do people think like this?

“Part of the problem is that there is a culture of complacency and that has in part been encouraged by these comments from Paul Flynn and the Council of Europe.

“Comments about the pandemic being an ‘unjustified scare’ and accusing WHO of ‘crying wolf’ I think entered the public consciousness.

“As a result people don’t bother to get vaccinated and GPs don’t store as much vaccine as they should.

“I think those members of the council who said these things should examine their consciences a bit and look at whether they gave enough attention to the kind of decisions public bodies like WHO had to make.

“Yes, swine flu didn’t turn out to be the mass killer we were afraid it would be, but nobody knew that beforehand, so surely it is better to be safe than sorry?”

When Wales on Sunday put his comments to Mr Flynn, the MP replied: “I have given my evidence, it was approved unanimously by the 47 members of the Council of Europe. I am very proud of the report that was produced in my name and I will be giving further evidence in Geneva and Brussels this year.

“While every death is a tragedy and I don’t want to belittle that, there were in fact far fewer deaths from seasonal flu last year than in years before, when at one point the flu death total was 68,000.

“This was because the effect of swine flu was to push out normal seasonal flu.

“Vaccines are a great advance in science and I wouldn’t discourage anyone from taking precautions, but I think at the moment there is a great deal of exaggeration going on.

“I am looking forward to seeing what the figures will be for this year but I believe the likelihood is that the deaths will be on a par with last year.”

_________________
Praemonitus, Praemunitus..Forewarned is Forearmed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: UK
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:22 pm
Posts: 5180
Location: East of London
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-storie ... -22836958/

Quote:
Flu strikes 16,000 NHS staff
By Nick Owens 9/01/2011

More than 16,000 doctors, nurses and NHS workers were off with flu-related illnesses yesterday in a staff crisis that is costing the NHS £12million a week

(me, I presume they mean Fri the 7th??)

And 71,900 sick days were lost in the past week alone.

The figures from First Data emerged as it was revealed that just one in five nurses opted for the flu jab this winter.

The low uptake has led to further criticism of the Government's handling of the swine-flu epidemic which has killed 50 people.
............................

_________________
Praemonitus, Praemunitus..Forewarned is Forearmed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: UK
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:22 pm
Posts: 5180
Location: East of London
http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showth ... 69&page=11

:hello: NS1 via FT

Quote:
The UK Health Protection Agency released a group of 37 sequences at GISAID dated 2010-01-05 that appeared sometime after that date. Some of the sequences in this deposit also appear on the Figure 3 Phylogenetic Tree from the HPA Eurosurveilance paper requested to be cited as:

Ellis J, Galiano M, Pebody R, Lackenby A, Thompson C, Bermingham A, McLean E, Zhao H, Bolotin S, Dar O, Watson JM, Zambon M. Virological analysis of fatal influenza cases in the United Kingdom during the early wave of influenza in winter 2010/11. Euro Surveill. 2011;16(1):pii=19760.
Available online:
http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArt ... leId=19760
Date of submission: 31 December 2010

The science community expected a full deposit to back the paper, but not all sequences noted on the phylogenetic table were in place at GISAIS as of this 2nd deposit.

The recent GISAID deposit added 4 of the fatalities noted on the phylogenetic tree to the 4 fatalities previously released on 2010-12-20. The previously released sequences were not marked at GISAID with a fatality notation, but now have been notated as "Deceased" as of yesterday. Oddly enough, on the 2010-01-05 deposit, none of the sequences notated as fatal on the phylogenetic tree were marked as to outcome at GISAID?

None of the sequences at the GISAID database that correspond to notated fatalities on the Eurosurveillance paper carry the severity marker of HA 225G.

225G is found on identical HA sequences noted as 2 severe cases.



UKEngland4880378_2010_12
UKEngland4940476_2010_12

The two sequences fall on a 100N, 188T, syn338G, 377K with 454N background. Appended to that background is a silent 179L previously found in US military sequences and as a regional marker in an alternate coding. A silent 448L completes the 225G sequences and is demonstrated in at least on fatal case, including in Russia.

. . . . UKEngland4940476_2010_12 (
. . . . . . . . 100N,
. . . . . . . . syn179L (CTg) [Regional Marker 2009 (tTA)]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [TexasAF2588_2009_10_04,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TexasJMS404_2010_01_08],
. . . . . . . . 188T,
. . . . . . . . 225G,
. . . . . . . . syn338G,
. . . . . . . . 377K,
. . . . . . . . syn448L [Yakutsk_EAV_2009_11_18,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yaroslavl_CHMV_2009_11_10_f with 224K & 225G mix],
. . . . . . . . 454N)

. . . . UKEngland4880378_2010_12 (
. . . . . . . . 100N,
. . . . . . . . syn179L,
. . . . . . . . 188T,
. . . . . . . . 225G,
. . . . . . . . syn338G,
. . . . . . . . 377K,
. . . . . . . . syn448L,
. . . . . . . . 454N)
__________________

http://GeneWurx.com

Independent Primary Research on Viral Genetics and the
Host-Pathogen Immune Dynamics of Zoonotic Influenza Reservoirs

_________________
Praemonitus, Praemunitus..Forewarned is Forearmed.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1292 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108 ... 130  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group