stephensons wrote:
Quote:
Just had a look at the phylogenetic tree. Correct me if I'm wrong we have 2 cases of D225G (coded D222G) and are they transmitting, like Ukraine in 2009
Quote:
You are correct. The two sequences are IDENTICAL and both cases are SEVERE
Ty.
Notice that the branch polymorphisms are not labeled from that point upwardly. The numbering system employed in our analyses adds 3 to the amino acid positions indicated in the UK chart.
The accumulation of 100N, 188T, 377K, 225G and 454N patterns onto the OzBrisbane209_51F_2010_08_09
sequence from the late winter in the Southern Hemisphere. Though parameters are adjustable for the phylogenetic chart, the top section may indicate one or more additional branches past the suspected 225G joint.
Are these strictly indicative of the high variability head and tail changes being seen frequently (under aa100, over aa499)?
GeneWurx_UK_December_Emerging_Genetics_v3.xlsIs it
probable that no instance of change at any amino acid position from
156 to 159 has been elucidated from this wide inspection of the severe wave?
Second sub-clade:
By chart appearances, the accumulation of 128D onto the more established backgrounds with 100N and 377K (lower section) creates a fatality risk similar to more recognised severity markers. The bottom fatal sequence designated on the lower branch as A/England/4780352/2010 is identified as UKWhiteChapel4780352_5M_2010_10_26_f in v3 of the GeneWurx Emerging Genetics spreadsheet within column AY and carries three additional silent (synonymous) changes at syn58C, syn131S and syn210S.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
