gsgs wrote:
based on submitted sequences
Mexico isn't really USA
Not much H1 in Southern USA
----edit----, I mean SW-USA,region 6,Texas
%of H1 in flu-A samples by US-region in 2010/1:
35,33,46,49,42,20,43,28,42,42
You really don't understand what a "herald wave" is or why your question is irrelevant. The Chihuahua sub-clade has broken off into two branches in 2011. The branch in Mexico is also in the US and the 8 US sequences on this branch are NOT in southern or SW -USA. Two of the 8 are in Texas, but 2 others are in Pennsylvania. Moreover, both Texas and Pennsylvania have an earlier version isolated in 2010 (and the PA sequence has D225G). The other four sequences on this lower branch are from NJ, MD, UT, and OR, so they also are not concentrated in the south or southwest. All 8 of these sequences are from 2011 isolates, largely collected in Feb and March. Thus, they appeared at the END of the 2010/2011 flu season, which is why they are called a herald wave (they define what will dominate in the comming season).
As noted on the WHO update, this sub-clade (with D225N) was initially seen Ecuador in January, 2011. It has spread rapidly in Mexico and Venezuela and now is being reported at increasing frequencies in Central and South America.
That is the key data, NOT the frequency in the US in the 2010/2011 season or the frequency in the south or southwest.
That is also why your question (and estimate) indicates you have no clue, even after many posts and commentaries describing the issue, with supporting comments by WHO and the Air Force, no reassortment or fantasy odds/bets required.