CopitoSP wrote:
As you see Dr.Henry, it was imprudent to speak about a new pandemic emerging almost 100% when data wasn't enough and was not coming out of official sources.
I think you are confused. I said that if the two cases were not linked AND the sequences matched, the the likelihood of a pandemic was near 100%. The "official" source did not contradict the pager alert (other than noting that the Illinois case was reported by Wisconsin, which is adjacent to Illinois).
The cases were 6 weeks apart and the sequences don't match, so criteria for the 100% estimate was not met.
Qualifiers are included for a reason, and summary statements made which ignore the qualifiers are misleading, at best.
The failure to meet the qualifiers was NOT linked to an unreliable source, In fact the source brought this situation to light 2 days ahead of the CDC report, and the information was NOT carried by western Europe.
Detection of these cases requires sequencing, which should be increased and results should be made public.
Public sequences of isolates fromhumans infected by swine H3N2 is lacking worldwide.