Rhiza Labs FluTracker Forum

The place to discuss the flu

Support This Site

 

Old Comment Archive

It is currently Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:34 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 92 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: D225E in Norway
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:54 pm
Posts: 878
What I want to know is can you take a nasal sample out of a patient and get
D225E
then take a lung sample and see D225G.
Are they in co-circulation in the SAME human, and is it already here in the US in these folks on Ecmo and vents but being missed because they are relying on nasal swabs?

Has ANYONE done ANY comparison between lung and nasal samples on US mortalities?

:scratch:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: D225E in Norway
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:06 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 6528
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
TheHappyScientist wrote:
What I want to know is can you take a nasal sample out of a patient and get
D225E
then take a lung sample and see D225G.
Are they in co-circulation in the SAME human, and is it already here in the US in these folks on Ecmo and vents but being missed because they are relying on nasal swabs?

Has ANYONE done ANY comparison between lung and nasal samples on US mortalities?

:scratch:

The have been several cases reported who tested negative multiple times, but were H1N1 positive at autopsy (where lungs would have been sampled).

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: D225E in Norway
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:08 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 6528
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
TheHappyScientist wrote:
What I want to know is can you take a nasal sample out of a patient and get
D225E
then take a lung sample and see D225G.
Are they in co-circulation in the SAME human, and is it already here in the US in these folks on Ecmo and vents but being missed because they are relying on nasal swabs?

Has ANYONE done ANY comparison between lung and nasal samples on US mortalities?

:scratch:

Mixtures will usually be an RBD chnage plus wild type, so nasal swab will be wild type, while lung will have and RBD change (or nasal swab is negative becaause virus has been cleared from upper respiratory tract).

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: D225E in Norway
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:09 pm
Posts: 14
niman wrote:
wotan wrote:
niman wrote:
Here are Genbank sequences with D225E

gb|CY052015.1| Influenza A virus (A/Norway/4023/2009(H1N1)) s... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY052007.1| Influenza A virus (A/Norway/3478/2009(H1N1)) s... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY051991.1| Influenza A virus (A/Norway/3059/2009(H1N1)) s... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY051987.1| Influenza A virus (A/Norway/2690/2009(H1N1)) s... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY051986.1| Influenza A virus (A/Norway/2674/2009(H1N1)) s... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY051982.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1761/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY051976.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1758/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY051964.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1748/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY051955.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1698/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY051940.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1674/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY051937.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1672/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|GU214058.1| Influenza A virus (A/Serbia/3547/2009(H1N1)) s... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY050319.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1641/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY050316.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1637/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY050313.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1632/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY050307.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1606/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY050304.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1605/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY050301.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1604/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
dbj|AB530488.1| Influenza A virus (A/Nagasaki/HA-44/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY049742.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1592/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY049736.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1587/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY049728.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1545/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY049707.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1479/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY049704.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1478/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY049051.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1436/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY049027.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1379/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY049024.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1369/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY049018.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1350/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY049015.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1333/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY049012.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1331/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY049003.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1304/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY049000.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1300/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047307.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1286/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047290.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1273/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047287.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1272/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047278.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1269/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047269.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1265/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047266.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1260/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047263.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1254/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047257.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1249/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047254.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1248/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047243.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1237/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047240.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1236/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047230.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1227/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047227.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1222/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047221.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1215/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047215.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1209/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047203.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1205/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047200.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1199/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047188.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1187/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047185.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1183/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047182.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1182/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047164.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1165/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047158.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1161/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|CY047137.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/S1120/2009(H1N1... 40.1 0.048
gb|GQ485661.1| Influenza A virus (A/Almati/01/2009(H1N1)) seg... 40.1 0.048
gb|GQ457519.1| Influenza A virus (A/Changsha/78/2009(H1N1)) s... 40.1 0.048
gb|GQ457514.1| Influenza A virus (A/California/25/2009(H1N1))... 40.1 0.048
gb|GQ422381.1| Influenza A virus (A/Milan/83/2009(H1N1)) segm... 40.1 0.048
gb|GQ422380.1| Influenza A virus (A/Milan/80/2009(H1N1)) segm... 40.1 0.048
gb|GQ421203.1| Influenza A virus (A/Ancona/05/2009(H1N1)) seg... 40.1 0.048
gb|GQ387430.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/378/2009(H1N1))... 40.1 0.048
gb|GQ387382.1| Influenza A virus (A/Italy/172/2009(H1N1)) hem... 40.1 0.048
gb|GQ365446.1| Influenza A virus (A/Sapporo/1/2009(H1N1)) seg... 40.1 0.048
gb|GQ355305.1| Influenza A virus (A/Catalonia/387/2009(H1N1))... 40.1 0.048
gb|GQ351314.1| Influenza A virus (A/Hong Kong/2369/2009(H1N1)... 40.1 0.048
gb|GQ258700.1| Influenza A virus (A/Athens/893/2009(H1N1)) se... 40.1 0.048
gb|GQ249333.1| Influenza A virus (A/Paris/2591/2009(H1N1)) se... 40.1 0.048
gb|GQ160534.1| Influenza A virus (A/New Jersey/01/2009(H1N1))... 40.1 0.048



Maybe they haven't released everything?

The list looks pretty comprehensive with samples colled from May through October. The sequences were deposited yesterday. I would say this all that they have.


From an article (published this past Friday) in one of the leading newspapers in Norway (translation via Google):
Quote:
Laboratory tests from 70 patients are examined, of which eight patients have died. Total is the mutation found in three of the patients. Two of them are dead, while the third is healthy again after having been admitted with serious illness. He became ill in August this year, and declared healthy same month, according to Health Directorate.

Laboratory samples were sent Tuesday to the World Health Organization reference laboratory in London, where it was confirmed a mutation. This means that the original virus has changed slightly.
So, it sounds as though samples from 70 patients were sent from Norway to Mill Hill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: D225E in Norway
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:23 pm
Posts: 57
Location: France
Is it possible to 'acquire" D225G with a vaccin ? I know this is not a 2 cents question...


Last edited by Anatine on Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: D225E in Norway
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:37 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 6528
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
I think I may dismissed other samples prematurely. There are only 25 at Genbank and only one has D225G (and it is mixture). I went back to Friday evening reports, as well as WHO's briefing on Norway, and there is NO doubt that all of those reports were talking about D225G. The WHO listing of other locations with the Norway "mutation", including Ukraine, exactly matches D255G. Similarly, D225G would be expected to direct the virus to lungs, and D225G is a chnage that would be a concern to anyone who has seen it (other than the writer of the WHO Ukraine press release which said nothing was significant).

I suspect the some samples may have been sent to Mill Hill, but only those that where likely or possible D225G. Mill Hill might also do some receptor binding studies (in Skehel lab) to see how similar Norway is to Ukraine (in binding profile).

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Last edited by niman on Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: D225E in Norway
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:38 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 6528
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Anatine wrote:
Is it possible to 'acquire" D225G with a vaccin ?

The vaccine target was not the clone with D225G.

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: D225E in Norway
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:23 pm
Posts: 57
Location: France
niman wrote:
Anatine wrote:
Is it possible to 'acquire" D225G with a vaccin ?

The vaccine target was not the clone with D225G.


Let"s ask the question again :blink: Does it make sense to think the vaccin may contain materials to get D225G mutation ? Does this question make sense ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: D225E in Norway
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:02 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 6528
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Anatine wrote:
niman wrote:
Anatine wrote:
Is it possible to 'acquire" D225G with a vaccin ?

The vaccine target was not the clone with D225G.


Let"s ask the question again :blink: Does it make sense to think the vaccin may contain materials to get D225G mutation ? Does this question make sense ?

No. D225G is not in the vaccine currently being used in vaccinations (it was in a clone NOT selected for scale up).

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: D225E in Norway
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 2:40 am
Posts: 575
niman wrote:
TheHappyScientist wrote:
What I want to know is can you take a nasal sample out of a patient and get
D225E
then take a lung sample and see D225G.
Are they in co-circulation in the SAME human, and is it already here in the US in these folks on Ecmo and vents but being missed because they are relying on nasal swabs?

Has ANYONE done ANY comparison between lung and nasal samples on US mortalities?

:scratch:

The have been several cases reported who tested negative multiple times, but were H1N1 positive at autopsy (where lungs would have been sampled).


It sure seems to me that the D225G is doing the killing, and their measurment system is the pits. No tellin' if it's from the nose or the lungs, no tellin' if it's D225 or D225G, or what's going on at 190. No telling what percentage of the explosively damaged bloody lung samples sequenced are D225G, now or 6 months ago or 1918. This should be real easy to sort out with a few tests.

Stunning how little data they have. What do they do all day, sit around with their feet up on the table?

_________________
If your leaders tell you the Kingdom is in the heavens, the birds will get there before you.
If they say it's beneath the ground, the fish will get there before you.
It is within you and outside you..P.Oxy 654


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 92 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group