gsgs wrote:
the GISAID-FAQ mentions the conditions on publishing results based on GISAID-data
search google for gisaid faq , then scroll down to the 4th question of the GISAID-FAQ
I assume the FAQ may not be quoted here since they claim copyright for their FAQ
and on a similar discussion at another forum they required quotes from their terms
and conditions to be removed.
I can't remember that I ever saw a publication based on GISAID-data, fullfilling
these conditions. Is there any ?
55000 hits for influenza at pubmed, zero for GISAID. How many of these 55000
do you estimate use GISAID-data and are published under the GISIAD
user-agreement ?
Those Ukraine sequences with 225G, do they appear in any publication ?
Seems that GISAID-data are lost for the scientific process.
Actually, I'm surprised that some of the posters of misinformation on GISAID haven't been sued. As stated MANY times in the past, for pH1N1, many of the public agencies that generate sequences almost exclusively release sequences at GISAID, so publications by the US CDC, NIID in Japan, the WHO center in Austrailia, Mill Hill in UK, etc, use GISAID sequences in publications, announcements, etc.
The initial Ukraine sequences were released by Mill Hill one day after the WHO press release announcing no significant chnages in Ukraine. The large number of autopsy lung sequences from Ukraine were released on the Monday following the Friday WER by WHO claimimg that D225G was not clustered in time and space.
CDC released the Duke death sequences prior to the "final" presentation on the spread at Duke.
Your lack of understanding of what sequences are released where, as well as the publication process, remains remarkable.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
