gsgs wrote:
and now to segment 7, which is the most bird-index
friendly of all.
1048 out of 2723 available full M1 protein sequences
are identical to the index !
This involves wild birds from distant places and times like:
0 0 244 51 Dk/HK/34/1976(H3N2), 1976 , 10 , 3 , 0
0 0 250 1381 gadwall/Altai/1328/07(H3N8)09, 2007 , 0 , 0 , 0
0 0 251 1373 mallard/Czech Republic/12652/07(H4N6)08/06, 2007 , 3 , 0 , 0
0 0 251 1957 mallard/MN/195/99(H4N6), 1999 , 3 , 0 , 0
0 0 252 2341 pintail/Barrow/38/05(H8N4), 2005 , 6 , 0 , 0
0 0 253 3 ostrich/South Africa/1991(H7N1), 1991 , 21 , 2 , 0
0 0 253 33 pelican/Zambia/01/06(H3N6)08, 2006 , 0 , 3 , 0
0 0 253 1102 Dk/England/1962(H4N8), 1962 , 10 , 0 , 0
0 0 253 1152 Dk/Altai/1285/1991(H5N3)08/15, 1991 , 10 , 0 , 0
0 0 253 1389 mallard/Czech Republic/14884-34/07(H9N2)09/24, 2007 , 3 , 0 , 0
0 0 253 1427 Dk/Memphis/546/1974(H11N9), 1974 , 10 , 0 , 0
0 0 253 1430 arctic tern/Alaska/300/1975(H5N3), 1975 , 4 , 0 , 0
0 0 253 1442 murre/Alaska/305/1976(H1N6)01/01, 1976 , 0 , 0 , 0
0 0 253 2664 Dk/NZL/31/1976(H4N6)01/01, 1976 , 10 , 0 , 0
0 0 253 2667 shearwater/AUS/405/1978(H3N8)10/29, 1978 , 0 , 0 , 0
0 0 253 2715 mallard/New Zealand/1615-17/04(H4N6), 2004 , 3 , 0 , 0
0 0 253 2716 Dk/Tasmania/277/07(H7N2), 2007 , 10 , 0 , 0
0 0 253 2719 Ck/Chile/4322/02(H7N3), 2002 , 1 , 0 , 0
Well segment 7 is the champion score!
However I recall segment 8 was somewhat bird-index friendly too!
Does the segment 8 have a comparable score of slow evolution in birds?
I am still checking the sepp8.gif. I understand that label “81” on picture stands for gene non structural #1 cloud, right?
We briefly discussed high S/N rates on paper correlating NP avian genes and 1918 sequences (1)
I also recalled from one of your first tables on this thread, that the [your ref.] A/avian/Alaska/Index(47H3N8,seg8verb.)/2006(H3N8)
had 44 differences [promile] compared with BM-18.
I compared segment 8, nonstructural protein 1 from /Brevig_Mission/1/18 (2) and isolate sequence A/mallard/Interior Alaska/3/2007.
Code:
Score = 464 bits (1195), Expect = 5e-136, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 225/230 (97%), Positives = 230/230 (100%), Gaps = 0/230 (0%)
Query 1 MDSNTVSSFQVDCFLWHVRKRFADQELGDAPFLDRLRRDQKSLRGRGSTLGLDIETATRA 60
MDSNTVSSFQVDCFLWHVRKRFADQELGDAPFLDRLRRDQKSLRGRG+TLGLDIETATRA
Sbjct 1 MDSNTVSSFQVDCFLWHVRKRFADQELGDAPFLDRLRRDQKSLRGRGNTLGLDIETATRA 60
.
Query 61 GKQIVERILKEESDEALKMTIASVPASRYLTDMTLEEMSRDWFMLMPKQKVAGSLCIRMD 120
GKQIVERIL+EESDEALKMTIASVPASRYLTDMTLEEMSRDWFMLMPKQKVAGSLCIRMD
Sbjct 61 GKQIVERILEEESDEALKMTIASVPASRYLTDMTLEEMSRDWFMLMPKQKVAGSLCIRMD 120
.
Query 121 QAIMDKNIILKANFSVIFDRLETLILLRAFTEEGAIVGEISPLPSLPGHTDEDVKNAVGV 180
QAIMDKNIILKANFSVIFDRLETLILLRAFTEEGAIVGEISPLPSLPGHTDEDVKNA+GV
Sbjct 121 QAIMDKNIILKANFSVIFDRLETLILLRAFTEEGAIVGEISPLPSLPGHTDEDVKNAIGV 180
.
Query 181 LIGGLEWNDNTVRVSETLQRFAWRSSNENGRPPLPPKQKRKMARTIKSEV 230
LIGGLEWNDNTVRVSETLQRFAWRSSNE+GRPPLPPKQKRKMARTI+SEV
Sbjct 181 LIGGLEWNDNTVRVSETLQRFAWRSSNEDGRPPLPPKQKRKMARTIESEV 230
I hope this sequence is a passable example of an index-like North American segment 8.
If so, is there any
Eurasian candidate sequence resembling mallard/Interior Alaska/3/2007 at
amino acid level [NA-EA] with a nonstructural protein 1 [segment 8], differently coded
across the ocean as observed earlier on some other segments?
From the alignement, there are 5 amino acid differences, and 42 nucleotide differences
Identities = 797/839 (94%), Gaps = 2/839 (0%)
[Nucleotide changes]/[amino acid changes] = 8.4
I think it is reasonable suppose that a number of amino acids are just
differently coded by silent differences:
Synonym differences : 37= (42-5)
Non synonym differences = 5. {O.K. ?}
(1)
Novel Origin of the 1918 Pandemic Influenza Virus Nucleoprotein Gene Ann H. Reid, Thomas G. Fanning, Thomas A. Janczewski, Raina M. Lourens, and Jeffery K. Taubenberger
http://jvi.asm.org/cgi/content/full/78/22/12462(2)
Sequence of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus nonstructural gene (NS) segment and characterization
of recombinant viruses bearing the 1918 NS genesChristopher F. Basler, Ann H. Reid, Jody K. Dybing, Thomas A. Janczewski, Thomas G. Fanning, Hongyong Zheng, Mirella Salvatore,
Michael L. Perdue, David E. Swayne, Adolfo Garcıa-Sastre, Peter Palese, and Jeffery K. Taubenberger
PNAS February 27, 2001 vol.
98 no. 5 [2746–2751]
http://www.pnas.orgycgiydoiy 10.1073ypnas.031575198