Rhiza Labs FluTracker Forum

The place to discuss the flu
It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 2:21 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:38 am
Posts: 968
The banning sounds silly, but I'm glad Dr. Niman is here; this is home.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:08 am
Posts: 436
I just posted up a link to Dr Niman's latest commentary ("Misinformation Linked to Explosion of Swine Flu in US Schools") over at FT and it was pulled with no explanation so it seems that FT will no longer even allow Dr Niman's commentary to be posted up as news items by others.

I haven't even had the courtesy of a pm telling me why my post was removed despite the fact I cannot figure out what rule I seem to have broken - all I posted was the information with no comments relating to the banning of Dr Niman.

The incredible irony here is that Florida1's actions are driving people to this site rather than FT


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:58 pm
Posts: 1400
Location: Katy, TX
Hogweed wrote:
I just posted up a link to Dr Niman's latest commentary ("Misinformation Linked to Explosion of Swine Flu in US Schools") over at FT and it was pulled with no explanation so it seems that FT will no longer even allow Dr Niman's commentary to be posted up as news items by others.

I haven't even had the courtesy of a pm telling me why my post was removed despite the fact I cannot figure out what rule I seem to have broken - all I posted was the information with no comments relating to the banning of Dr Niman.

The incredible irony here is that Florida1's actions are driving people to this site rather than FT


They are only hurting their own credibility. So, so sad. :(

_________________
I am not a doctor, virologist, or any of type of medical/life sciences professional.

I am a layman with a background in the physical sciences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:30 am 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27549
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Hogweed wrote:
I just posted up a link to Dr Niman's latest commentary ("Misinformation Linked to Explosion of Swine Flu in US Schools") over at FT and it was pulled with no explanation so it seems that FT will no longer even allow Dr Niman's commentary to be posted up as news items by others.

I haven't even had the courtesy of a pm telling me why my post was removed despite the fact I cannot figure out what rule I seem to have broken - all I posted was the information with no comments relating to the banning of Dr Niman.

The incredible irony here is that Florida1's actions are driving people to this site rather than FT

Actually, the pulling of commentaries is quite ironic in many respects. One web site that I don't consider to be credible, had banned links to Recombinomics commentaries. I knew the owner of the site becasue he had asked for an "endorsement" when he started the site (on the flu pandemic) and when I asked him why he was blocking the links, he said that as long as the commentary had a link to flutrackers.com, he would ban the commentaries (the "media link" at the bottom of commentaries links to the thread with the original news story, which I used to post at flutrackers.com).

I told him that pandemic sites that block recombinomics commentaries really have no credibility as a pandemic news site.

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:21 pm
Posts: 79
I had a post referring to Dr. Niman removed also, as have others. Dr. Niman's name is no longer included in the User List of the other site. For me, the credibility of the other site no longer exists. Without Dr. Niman's information and participation it has become nothing more than a bunch of news posts, subjective comments, and incorrect and confusing data interpretation. :cry:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:21 pm
Posts: 79
quote]Its making me regret my donation, and rethink the time I spend there.[/quote]

Yes, me too. I was just setting up a monthly donation. With the removal of my post, that loyalty in both time and attention will change.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 2:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:08 am
Posts: 436
Quote:
Dr. Niman's name is no longer included in the User List of the other site.

You can still get the stats if you click on Niman in an old post

niman niman is offline
Retired

Last Activity: Yesterday 03:10 PM

Statistics
Total Posts

* Total Posts: 20,335
* Posts Per Day: 15.69

General Information

* Last Activity: Yesterday 03:10 PM
* Join Date: February 8th, 2006
* Referrals: 12

=====
20,000 plus posts for an average of 16 per day over three and a half years. Now silenced at FT just as the pandemic we all feared enters a critical phase.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:37 pm
Posts: 1856
I think you are being missed, Niman...
http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showth ... p?t=122942


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:04 pm
Posts: 129
Location: Earth, Sol System, Milky Way
Roche: few cases of Tamiflu-resistant swine flu
Published: Monday, Sep. 07, 2009
Updated: Monday, Sep. 07, 2009

Quote:
Swiss pharmaceutical giant Roche Holding AG said Monday that it has had reports of 13 cases of pandemic swine flu becoming resistant to Tamiflu, which it calls a very low percentage.

A good sign is that the people who had the resistant strain have not passed the disease on to other people, said David Reddy, leader of Roche's Tamiflu pandemic task force. And the resistant variety has been like the widespread version of the virus in that it typically produces only mild symptoms.

The 13 cases were scattered around the world in Europe, the United States and Asia, said Reddy.


Uh, now I may be a microbiological ignoramus, but I would like to know how Mr. Reddy knows that those having the resistant strain did not pass it on to other people. And is it just me all ate up with smooth-brain syndrome or is having 13 confirmed cases of oseltamivir-resistant swine flu popping up all over the world in Europe, the United States, and Asia a bad thing? I mean, for each case that is confirmed and documented how many others go unconfirmed and undocumented? Bet that ratio is pretty healthy. Also, from a sample of just 13 confirmed cases he concludes that the resistant strain is typically mild? Does any one else get a strong whiff of bowel off of this thing?

_________________
Those who listen only to what they want to hear end up dancing with their own reflections - in the Abyss.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:09 pm 
Online

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 27549
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Tom23 wrote:
Roche: few cases of Tamiflu-resistant swine flu
Published: Monday, Sep. 07, 2009
Updated: Monday, Sep. 07, 2009

Quote:
Swiss pharmaceutical giant Roche Holding AG said Monday that it has had reports of 13 cases of pandemic swine flu becoming resistant to Tamiflu, which it calls a very low percentage.

A good sign is that the people who had the resistant strain have not passed the disease on to other people, said David Reddy, leader of Roche's Tamiflu pandemic task force. And the resistant variety has been like the widespread version of the virus in that it typically produces only mild symptoms.

The 13 cases were scattered around the world in Europe, the United States and Asia, said Reddy.


Uh, now I may be a microbiological ignoramus, but I would like to know how Mr. Reddy knows that those having the resistant strain did not pass it on to other people. And is it just me all ate up with smooth-brain syndrome or is having 13 confirmed cases of oseltamivir-resistant swine flu popping up all over the world in Europe, the United States, and Asia a bad thing? I mean, for each case that is confirmed and documented how many others go unconfirmed and undocumented? Bet that ratio is pretty healthy. Also, from a sample of just 13 confirmed cases he concludes that the resistant strain is typically mild? Does any one else get a strong whiff of bowel off of this thing?

Actually it is worse than you think, because the historical numbers are from sub-optimal use in children in Japan many years ago, which is not relevant to the recent resistance is seasonal and pandmeic flu whoch only involve H274Y in H1N1. There were ZERO recent cases in seasonal H3N2 because the seasonal and pandmeic H1N1 resistance is linked to recombination, NOT spontaneous mutations (wich are VERY rare).
H274Y is quite widespread and largey just below the detection range, so most samples colllect BEFORE Tamiflu treatment test as wild type, but resistance develops VERY quickly very often (but is not tested in samples collected after treatment.

_________________
www.twitter.com/hniman


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group